Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Juan G. Arango 🇨🇴  🇮🇹's avatar

Great article. The problem here is, like the rest of Miami, he was sold as an "economic salvation"

to the City of Miami and South Florida. The question is what happens after he retires? If that money drops, then it was just a money grab.

Emmanuel Smith's avatar

Carla !

Well done, again. I like what you’re doing here. You know how to pull the business levers into view.

Two things:

First, una preguntita…underneath the “Lionel Messi Effect”

who actually captures the Messi-driven surplus, by mechanism, after MLS rules and Apple TV platform economics take their cut? Where does the money land, and who misses it?

I ask this often because I lived in Miami pre-and post- Messi arrival. I watched the city flip into spectacle mode, the same kind of street buzz I saw when I was again living in Miami and Lebron came the Heat.

Great energy, but also a zoo, with nonstop attention and global eyes.

And yet I didn’t see the carryover into the broader city. I saw far more community touchpoints from the Heat era than I ever saw from Inter Miami CF. I can point to more moments where the club avoided local engagement than moments where it invested in it.

So I have a challenge for you, if it’s interesting.

I’d love a follow-up with your eyes that traces who captures the upside (club, league, sponsors, secondary ticket sellers, platforms), who eats the costs (hosts, staff, city logistics), and what the club returns to the community, if anything measurable.

If we call it a macroeconomic event, we need to audit where the surplus went. Especially in a city like Miami with significant socioeconomic disparity

You have a real eye for threads…keep going!

16 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?